Curaleaf Strain Names, Spanish Quotes About Love, Portuguese Water Dog Breeders, Roswell Daily Record Shooting, Articles C

Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. This lens provides all of these requirements. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. Heh, it's amazing how far Samyang has come since this article (I'm loving their 45 & 75 f1.8), and kinda amusing that they ended up delivering exactly what you asked for Kinda reminds me of that article by Roger Cicala about how long lens development takes. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. Available Monday. In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! It is fantastic on my old 5d. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. Perhaps you have seen the photos of masterful Russian portrait photographers such as Elena Shumilova or Anka Zhuravleva. The 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.2 is another story.While the 135mm f/2, in general, is a good lens, there are lots of lenses other than the 135 f/2 that will produce a very smoothly blurred background, including zoom lenses.It sounds like Micael is new to photography.Just my impression from this article. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. Creamy smooth bokeh. In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. My point is that we must never lose the joy of photography. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. I'm not a fan of the large hood. F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Seems like a great lens. Sharp but smooth at the same time. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Yes, because it is not f/2. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". Another lens to consider at this focal length (at maximum zoom) is the Rokinon 135mm F/2. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Tiring. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Another thing that makes people go "wow" over the 135mm F2 lens design is the bokeh, which can be so creamy that distant backgrounds almost render as gradients. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. Is there a reason why a 135/2.8 or even 135/4 would provide significantly different images? For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Bye [emailprotected]. Bokeh is buttery smooth, best you can get from a 135mm. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. Must have if you're serious about portraits. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. And it's not the one problem from my L lenses very sad =(, My favourite lens, hands down. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. It just doesn't get any better than this! How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? So there - it is not a perfect object. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. Add To Cart. Great for portraits. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. Voting ends March 8, 2023. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. PRICE. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. Sharp without being harsh. As soon as e.g. I would! The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. However, all the reviews were made by nature and sports photographers, and I would like to find out more about their performance in astrophotography. I had both for a while. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) One of my very best lenses! Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. The North America Nebula captured using the 135mm lens with a clip-in Ha filter. I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. 6 Reasons I Love the Canon 135mm f/2 Lens - YouTube Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. Definitely now on my to-buy list. The lens shows a very slight pincushion distortion, but it's well under 0.1% of frame height, an excellent performance by any measure. Crazy fast AF! Show some humility and don't troll. It's a trade off. A quick question, I have a Sony a6300 mirrorless camera which is great but the sensor is very close behind the mount. Not rude at all, a fair comment. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. Let's dig in. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. But for me, the reason to get this lens is the Bokeh and DOF control. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. The lenses I listed are certainly not the ONLY exceptional lenses made over the years. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. Focus throw. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent I think prime users get too used to the idea of bokeh as the only answer. In fact, it might be fun to try! Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. I typically shoot with Canon lenses, but the potential for low light photography (whether thats astrophotography or the ability to film at dusk) caught my interest. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. IS would also help outside with wind. No, Mr. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. This lens is available for several camera mounts, including Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Samsung, and Fuji. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry. I wish every lens was this good!! here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: Also, accurate guiding is essential. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. She doesn't look like she is there. lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. But will live with it as it provides good protection of the front element. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). Dear Trevor, http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. Well saturated but neutral. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. Test Notes For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). Some noteworthy targets to try. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. I bought it for its bokeh. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. If you have a more appropriate portrait lens like an 85, 90 or 100, the 135 does not bring you very much. However, I am convinced that its large aperture and fast F ratio would perform exceptionally well in three color or narrow band H-alpha and OIII photography. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! Lenses with extreme sharpness and bokeh tend to be heavy. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. You will see why. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. Hey Trevor, great article! You just panned the subject for his photos and then turn around and needle thematic for looking into Ericsson. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. 135mm f2 vs 200 f2.8 primes? - Beginning Deep Sky Imaging - Cloudy Nights Got it! The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats.